Paternalistic social engineering or make-Britain-great-again utopianism? A new archive film compilation takes a look at the UKs controversial postwar towns
” People sometimes supposed to say to me,’ You must get a terrific kick out of having been responsible for a huge thing like a new town ,'” said Sir Frederick Gibberd in an interview in 1982, 35 years after he generated the new township of Harlow.” Well, I get a lot of misery out of it, in fact. I go around and think,’ My god, that’s unbelievably bad, and it could have been so good .'”
If that was what the designer guessed, imagine how everyone else who moved to Harlow felt. The interview comes in a short film at the end of New Towns, Our Towns, a new compilation of archive cinemas from the Independent Cinema Office chronicling Britain’s pioneering postwar new township movement- and our ongoing love-hate relationship with it. Paternalistic social engineering or make-Britain-great-again utopianism? Textbook example of the failures of macro modernism, or the type of bold, ambitious government initiative we need more of?
The project began in earnest with the New Towns Act of 1946, which sought to restore the nation’s housing stock after the second world war but also, in southern England, check the urban sprawl of London by entice city-dwellers to modern settlements outside the green belt. During the first phase, that meant places such as Harlow, Basildon, Stevenage, Hemel Hempstead, in later phases, Peterborough and Milton Keynes– 22 towns in all.