Don’t blame humen for London’s cycling problems- fix our feral streets

We might find more girls, children and a greater diversity of riders in the capital if the mayor and his cycling tsar forged ahead with their promise to transform cycling

Will Norman, who is London’s cycling tsar under mayor Sadiq Khan, has identified a problem with motorcycle employ as it exists in the city. However, it’s one where the answer lies chiefly with Norman and his boss.

In an interview with the Independent, Norman said he fretted cycling in the capital was too much the preserve of white, middle-class humen. Many might agree. But what Norman omits is that this isn’t down to the cyclists – it’s a direct product of the street they are forced to use.

The evidence from around the world shows that the more safe and reassuring the road infrastructure is for bikes, the greater the variety of cyclists. In the Netherlands, for example, a slightly higher proportion of women cycle than humen. In Odense, which styles itself as Denmark’s most bike-friendly city, 81% of children ride to school, generally without their parents. These are places that have expended 40 years making streets more amenable to human beings.

In contrast, London remains a largely feral and hostile surrounding for cyclists, despite the arrival of a handful of so-called cycle superhighways. It is a road culture that emphasises speed and assertiveness, and this tends to put off many but the most gung-ho, enthusiast riders, who tend to be drawn from a smaller demographic pool.

The solution is clear- safer cycling streets. Unfortunately, Norman and Khan aren’t exactly rushing ahead with this. Khan promised before his election in 2016 to transform cycling, but he and Norman have become mired in endless lags and consultation, seeking to assuage a minority of critics who will never be convinced.

It is, as one exasperated campaigner notes, as if Joseph Bazalgette had been stopped from house his sewers for a two-year consultation on whether separating drinking water from sewage was a good idea.

Norman is enthusiastic and keen, and no one can expect he and Khan to transform London overnight. But equally, it needs to be pointed out that their own absence of boldness is exacerbating the very male problem Norman complains about.

Read more: www.theguardian.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *