Outdoor pollution has risen 8% in five years with fast-growing cities in the developing world worst affected, WHO data shows
Outdoor air pollution has grown 8% globally in the past five years, with billions of people around the world now exposed to dangerous air, according to new data from more than 3,000 cities compiled by the World Health Organisation( WHO ).
While all regions are affected, fast-growing cities in the Middle East, south-east Asia and the western Pacific are the most impacted with many indicating pollution levels at five to 10 days above WHO recommended levels.
According to the new WHO database, levels of ultra-fine particles of less than 2.5 microns( PM2. 5s) are highest in India, which has 16 of the worlds 30 most polluted cities.
China, which has been plagued by air pollution, has improved its air quality since 2011 and now has only five cities in the top 30. Nine other countries, including Pakistan and Iran, have one city each in the worst 30.
For the larger, but slightly less dangerous PM10 particles, India has eight cities in the worlds top 30. Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan each have two cities in the top 10. The true figure for the growth in global air pollution is likely to be worse because only a handful of African cities monitor their levels.
The most polluted city in the world, according to the WHO data, is Onitsha, a fast-growing port and transit city in south-eastern Nigeria that recorded high levels of virtually 600 micrograms per cubic metre of PM10s – around 30 hours the WHO recommended level of 20 micrograms per cubic metre.
Air pollution levels were generally much lower for cities in developed countries with Sydney, New York and London registering 17, 16 and 22 micrograms per cubic metre for PM10s respectively. However, the data only includes measurings for particulates and does not include forms of air pollution such as NO2 and ozone.
We have a public health emergency in many countries. Urban air pollution continues to increase at an alarming rate, wreaking havoc on human health. Its dramatic, one of the biggest problems we are facing globally, with terrible future costs to society, said Dr Maria Neira, director of public health at the WHO in Geneva.
The cost for countries is enormous. Air pollution affects economies and people quality of life. It leads to major chronic conditions and to people ultimately succumbing, she said.
The new data, is coming from city and academic records, proves a rapid deterioration in air quality as low-income cities grow unchecked and populations become unable to escape clouds of smog and soot from transport, industry, construction sites, farming and wood-burning in homes.
Outdoor air pollution causes more than 3m deaths a year – more than malaria and HIV/ Aids – and is now the biggest single murderer in the world. The toll ought to be able to double as urban populations increase and vehicle numbers approach 2bn by 2050.
Air pollutants such as sulphates, nitrates and black carbon penetrate deep into the lungs and into the cardiovascular system, posing the greatest hazards to human health, says the UN.
As urban air quality deteriorations, the risk of stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and chronic and acute respiratory diseases, including asthma, increases for the people who live in them. When dirty air blankets our cities the most vulnerable urban populations – the youngest, oldest and poorest – are the most impacted, said Flavia Bustreo, WHO assistant director general.
Encouragingly, there is evidence from the WHO data that many cities are addressing air pollution. More than half of the monitored cities in high-income countries and more than one-third of those in low- and middle-income countries reduced their air pollution levels by more than 5% in five years. Delhi, one of the most polluted cities in the world, has banned big diesel vehicles from going into the city centre.
Measures taken by cities include reducing industrial smokestack emissions, increasing the use of renewable power sources like solar and wind, and prioritising rapid transit, strolling and cycling networks in cities. Many cities are also committed to reducing reducing car traffic and diesel vehicles in particular.
The UNs third outdoor air pollution database suggests the cleanest cities in the world are generally small, wealthy and situated far away from industrial centres. Muonio in Finland, a town above the Arctic circle, has the worlds purest recorded urban air, recording only 2 micrograms per cubic metre of PM2. 5 pollution and 4 micrograms per cubic metre of PM10s. It is closely followed by Norman Wells in Canada, Campisbalos in Spain and Converse County, Wyoming in the US.
Of 52 UK towns and cities included in the UN database, Port Talbot in south Wales, a hub for the UK steel industry, is the most polluted, ahead of London, Glasgow, Southampton and Leeds. The cleanest UK city in the WHO list is Inverness, followed by Bournemouth, Newcastle and Sunderland.
The most polluted city in Australia, according to the data, is Geraldton, a major seaport on the west coast , north of Perth. The most polluted city in the United States is the inland city of Visalia-Porterville in California.
More than 80% of people living in urban areas that monitor air pollution are exposed to air quality levels that exceed the World Health Organisation limits. While all regions of the world are affected, populations in low-income cities are the most impacted; 98% of cities in low- and middle income countries with more than 100,000 dwellers do not fulfill WHO air quality guidelines. However, in high income countries, that percentage decreases to 56%, said the WHO.
It is crucial for city and national governments to stimulate urban air quality a health and growth priority, said Dr Carlos Dora, co-ordinator of the WHOs Interventions for Healthy Environment programme. When air quality improves, health expenses from air pollution associated cancers shrink, worker productivity expands and life expectancy grows. Reducing air pollution also brings an added climate bonus, which can become a part of countries commitments to the climate treaty.
Read more: www.theguardian.com